When comparing my time in Seville and other places in
Southern Spain against my experience in Barcelona, the characteristics of each
begin to more clearly explain the personality and direction of the two regions.
For example, prior to our trip I was aware of Barcelona’s reputation as a very
liberal city, though I was only occasionally made aware in examples such as the
large public artworks or the persistent marijuana odor. However, when compared
against Seville the context of Barcelona becomes more apparent, the
architectural and historical differences more pronounced. Seville is in many
ways the national and global image of Spain; a mountainous terrain inhabited by
tapas-eating bullfighters and flamenco dancers. Everything from the meter wide
streets to the mostly untouched urban fabric of the city attests to a city with
a strong tradition of tradition. Of course Barcelona does not lack interest in
its tradition, but how it approaches it becomes the decisive difference between
North and South. Where Seville is more the static gatekeeper of a national
identity, Barcelona is, especially through its architecture, actively
interpreting its past. For example, in the context of Franco’s Spain, Seville
benefited from the fascist national identity because both served to strengthen
their cultural dominance. However, for Barcelona and Cataluña, this meant the
active destruction of their culture in the creation of a national Spanish
identity. Hence, while the cultural (and therefore architectural) goal of Seville
is complete stasis and consistency, Barcelona’s becomes one of self-reflection
and active interpretation against the noise of a national conscious. While
approaching a historic project in Seville, the goal is to blend in to the
overwhelming presence of what is already there; In Barcelona, it is to tell and
maintain a history that is not always visible.
No comments:
Post a Comment