When comparing Ciutadella Park against Montjuic, it helps to
keep in mind the concept of the two ears of Barcelona, or the reflection and use
of each as measured against one another. While each park serves its community
in a similar way, the construction of either is markedly different in planning
and execution. To begin, each park shares many similarities; both were military
installations (Ciutadella Park was built atop a medieval fortress, Montjuic
served an important defensive position) and both occupy important spaces within
their surrounding communities. The main differences in each is found in its
planning, however. Whereas Montjuic reflects a more organic and drawn out
process of growth, the plan of Ciutadella Park betrays the single project that
replaced the existing fortress on which it was built. And, while Montjuic
attempts to build some of Ciutadella’s logic into its fabric with the Olympic
Stadium (and Ciutadella attempting loose form to the east of its French
landscaped severity) it never achieves the same form of structure or coherency
as Ciutadella. Contrasting one against the other in terms of Charles Waldhelm’s
landscape urbanism, the strict construction and clear planning of Ciutadella
Park against the free form of Montjuic draws a striking parallel to the rest of
urban Barcelona; all one has to do is replace Montjuic with the Gothic Quarter
and Ciutadella Park with the Eixample and one has a clear comparison to the
rest of the built environment. In each park exists an urban building module and
structure, especially when considering the impact of either on their surrounding
communities.
No comments:
Post a Comment