The city of Barcelona is known for taking liberal risks with
their buildings and facades, which luckily often pays off in new and
interesting ways for the city. Along our bike tour we encountered many such
examples, and in turn attempted to gain the essence of each in drawing as few
lines as possible while still representing the value of each. The first we were
asked to represent was the Illa de la Llum, by architects Lluis Collet and
Ignacio, a building whose balconies and floor slabs are treated in a way so
that the façade starts to deconstruct and resemble an unfinished building. When
attempting to draw the façade, the trouble comes in representing a complex
system of moveable panels through a restricted amount of lines. Thus, by
drawing its two roofs and slightly offsetting the connecting vertical line the
façade’s character is hinted at, though ultimately required more than three
lines to become thoroughly coherent. A second façade we were asked to study
actually consisted of two buildings, and their combined effect on one another.
The two buildings were Torre Diagonal by EMBA and the Barcelona Forum by Herzog
and De Muron, and both served to symbiotically heighten the transparency and
effect of each other. In my
drawing, I attempt to convey the overlap that occurs not just between the
building profiles, but also the fenestration and shading systems of both. The Torre Diagonal acts as a
continuation not only of what is happening at the Forum, but also a reflection
of the sky and clouds so that it becomes an articulation of the existing site
instead of an object in its own right.
Adam Williams
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
San Antoni Library, Barcelona's premiere coffin for books
In your estimation, does your drawing represent the form
and materiality of the San Antoni Library? Elaborate on why or
why not?
The drawing I had made of the San Antoni Library is
successful in some respects and short in others, though I partially blame the
poor weather for some of its shortcomings. The drawing portrays well two
important aspects of the building’s form, that of its proportion and its
recessive volumes. In relation to its neighboring buildings, the library takes
cue of the existing vertical rhythm to create its volume, as well as void and
openings. Within this void the recessive volume becomes important through its
relation between the front and back facades, as well as how it serves to
connect its flanking volumes. More abstract is the representation of the
materials, especially in the case of this particular library. The black,
reflective metal of the building serves to provide an intangible quality to the
architecture through reflection, much in the way a monument would. (e.g. the
Vietnam War Memorial in Washington, D.C.) In the drawing I attempt to approach
this by showing the physical, vertical lines of the material on the façade, as
well as the stratified shadows created by the recessed volume. However, perhaps
due to the cloudy weather and lack of light, the building’s reflection was not
strikingly clear and hence fairly difficult to put onto paper with pencil alone.
Perhaps through another medium, such as watercolor or something similarly
transparent, the building’s reflective qualities would have been made more
obvious through the drawing.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Form and Order and Bushes
When comparing Ciutadella Park against Montjuic, it helps to
keep in mind the concept of the two ears of Barcelona, or the reflection and use
of each as measured against one another. While each park serves its community
in a similar way, the construction of either is markedly different in planning
and execution. To begin, each park shares many similarities; both were military
installations (Ciutadella Park was built atop a medieval fortress, Montjuic
served an important defensive position) and both occupy important spaces within
their surrounding communities. The main differences in each is found in its
planning, however. Whereas Montjuic reflects a more organic and drawn out
process of growth, the plan of Ciutadella Park betrays the single project that
replaced the existing fortress on which it was built. And, while Montjuic
attempts to build some of Ciutadella’s logic into its fabric with the Olympic
Stadium (and Ciutadella attempting loose form to the east of its French
landscaped severity) it never achieves the same form of structure or coherency
as Ciutadella. Contrasting one against the other in terms of Charles Waldhelm’s
landscape urbanism, the strict construction and clear planning of Ciutadella
Park against the free form of Montjuic draws a striking parallel to the rest of
urban Barcelona; all one has to do is replace Montjuic with the Gothic Quarter
and Ciutadella Park with the Eixample and one has a clear comparison to the
rest of the built environment. In each park exists an urban building module and
structure, especially when considering the impact of either on their surrounding
communities.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
North or South, You Can't go Wrong so Take Yer Pick
When comparing my time in Seville and other places in
Southern Spain against my experience in Barcelona, the characteristics of each
begin to more clearly explain the personality and direction of the two regions.
For example, prior to our trip I was aware of Barcelona’s reputation as a very
liberal city, though I was only occasionally made aware in examples such as the
large public artworks or the persistent marijuana odor. However, when compared
against Seville the context of Barcelona becomes more apparent, the
architectural and historical differences more pronounced. Seville is in many
ways the national and global image of Spain; a mountainous terrain inhabited by
tapas-eating bullfighters and flamenco dancers. Everything from the meter wide
streets to the mostly untouched urban fabric of the city attests to a city with
a strong tradition of tradition. Of course Barcelona does not lack interest in
its tradition, but how it approaches it becomes the decisive difference between
North and South. Where Seville is more the static gatekeeper of a national
identity, Barcelona is, especially through its architecture, actively
interpreting its past. For example, in the context of Franco’s Spain, Seville
benefited from the fascist national identity because both served to strengthen
their cultural dominance. However, for Barcelona and Cataluña, this meant the
active destruction of their culture in the creation of a national Spanish
identity. Hence, while the cultural (and therefore architectural) goal of Seville
is complete stasis and consistency, Barcelona’s becomes one of self-reflection
and active interpretation against the noise of a national conscious. While
approaching a historic project in Seville, the goal is to blend in to the
overwhelming presence of what is already there; In Barcelona, it is to tell and
maintain a history that is not always visible.
The Eixample, or Barcelona's Big Brother
10 Lessons from Barcelona, Manuel de Sola-Morales, p.306-308
“Residents’ and visitors’ memory of the city will always be
associated with an awareness of the planned space. But it is the form of its
physical grid as a mental image, the evidence of its imperturbable permanence
that allows us to experience this idea and this awareness.”
During our walk throughout Barcelona’s Eixample, the one
thing present during the entire time was Cerda. Every time you cut a chamfered
corner, the architectural responsiveness of the buildings shows great respect
and adherence towards his very specific planning for the city. In few other
cities do you feel such tension between a city’s architecture and its planning;
the personality of the Eixample is characterized by calculated interactions
between the two. Cerda’s octagonal module becomes a very visible game for
architects building around its rules, and how they are maintained or broken
defines the identity of the city’s spaces. Nowhere is this more apparent than
the block courtyards. Walking into these spaces revealed more rebellious
interpretations of the grid than is present on its exterior. While some couryards,
such as the Passatge Permanyer or Jardins de Rector Oliveras maintain a
completely open and regular entry and courtyard in what closely resembles
Cerda’s intentions, others such as the Casa Elizade gardens more freely
interpret their purpose. In said example, the entry is fashioned into a multi-height,
Neo-Classical entrance containing an art gallery that uses the space for public
video installations. Yet, where the entry path ends so does the consistency, as
you are pushed out from classical proportioning into a patchwork courtyard of
balconies and a couple of awnings. Yet despite the schizophrenic progression of
spaces from exterior to interior, the block is consistent in its language to
the rest of the Eixample, and so reminds and encourages us to draw comparisons
not only to Cerda’s original plan, but also to its other architectural
inhabitants.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)